There’s a term that’s been insinuating itself into the language, mainly through its commonplace usage in popular media. You know it. Like ’sunsets’, ‘blood relatives’, ‘from the bottom of my heart’, and other colorful but misleading idioms, it’s taken on its own little bundle of taken-for-granted meanings. I’m thinking about it because it was an agenda item in a professional workshop I participated in last week. What do people mean when they say “achievement gap?” What is it supposed to mean to me?

Instead of thinking, “OK, I know what that is,” I was immediately uncomfortable hearing the words ‘achievement gap’ because they sounded odd coming from a guest speaker in the school library with the donuts, the tea, the books and the hard little chairs. The word itself felt like an intruder, like a relative you’d rather not see who shows up uninvited to a family gathering. Unhelpful. Uncooperative. Vague. Confrontational. Pointy. Non negotiable. I don’t think I’ve ever said “achievment gap” to describe anything on my own. It’s someone else’s word. It’s jargon for something that I don’t fully understand. Nonetheless, hearing it the other day in the school library coming from the mouth of another teacher started this thought that I haven’t yet finished with. I’m exorcising the demon, trying to stop the ringing in my ears.

Our guest speakers were there to lead us through an exercise. I might have been happier if we could have first talked about what an achievement gap might be, but instead we were asked to write down our thoughts about what caused the “achievement gap.” I was groaning inside. I wrote down a few things about how an achievement gap is a social construction, and not a real thing. We recognize it through standardized test results and the unequal distribution of wealth in our society. Everyone took a break, and I kept writing on my little scrap of paper.

We then watched a video called A Class Divided in which a teacher named Jane Elliot subjected her young students to a cruel lesson in discrimination and oppression based on their eye color. Parts of the video were funny because you could see some of these little characters weren’t playing her game. By the end of the day, though, she had them all pretty twisted. As a way of showing the other half of the class, “Now YOU see how it feels!” and to even the score, she had the kids switch roles the next day and double the damage. The lady meant well, but clearly we’re operating on a different ethical plane now than we were in the 1960’s when this abusive little piece of teacher research was conducted. The film we saw included footage of these kids discussing this event 15 years later when they’d reached adulthood. They thanked Ms. Elliot for her powerful lesson. I wonder how many students didn’t show up, and wouldn’t have thanked her. The point Ms. Elliot (and our presenters) were trying to make was that racial discrimination is irrational, it hurts, and it interferes with learning. Yes. I got that. Our presenters told us not to try this experiment with our own students. Uh…OK, thanks for the advice. And I won’t swallow rat poison anytime soon, either.

The good part came when we got together in small groups with the chart paper and the markers and had to answer discussion questions. The folks I sat with had an honest discussion with no whining about having to write on chart paper. We decided that even though test scores do indicate a difference in achievement among some of our students, the tests themselves are not immediately consequential. The real consequences are the unequal access to capital resources and power in society. Prejudice is real, and it is reproduced and reinforced in school. When we talked about the ways that school did this, one of the major culprits we identified was - that’s right - curriculum. We weren’t ready to go into our own individual racist tendencies, or the contradictions inherent in teaching both conformity to conventional values and individual freedom. Middle class values don’t easily admit knotty discussions in casual company.

Each group finally stood up and said pretty much the same thing to the other groups. Platitudes were offered regarding respecting individual differences and honoring diversity. It was time for lunch. We thanked our guest speakers and moved on to other business, but I’m still wondering about how this applies to me?

If I have anything to do with the “achievement gap” it must be somehow connected to a function that I serve which remains outside the scope of my intentions. If through my agency kids are failing to learn, then I better shape up and do something else. The “achievement gap” wasn’t created by teachers. It is the product of racist and culturally biased institutions that embrace middle class values and shun association with minority points of view. Why don’t businesses and corporations do something about the achievement gap? Ah, but they are. They have politicians pushing standards, and testing, and sanctions, and vouchers, and intelligent design. This entire issue is about getting kids ready to uncritically participate in the economy no matter what they might be asked to do. Like I do! It isn’t about teaching them to think for themselves, or to find fulfillment as human beings. No. The “achievement gap” is about induction into a middle class value system that endorses free markets ahead of free people. Kids who don’t buy in are forced out. Teachers too, eh? I wonder how long I’ve got.

The only way through this is going to involve creating a different classroom reality. It isn’t an achievement gap; it’s a reality gap. Whose world are we helping to build?