<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Senator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/</link>
	<description>(bôr'dər-lănd') n. Located on or near a frontier. An indeterminate area or condition.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-43946</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-43946</guid>
		<description>This letter template is not only well wriiten but educational as well.  I  am a veteran 4th grade teacher and I have and eleven year old daughter. I must admit that my fear of the "web" and communication via the internet has left me in the dark. My students and my daughter know more about the computer peering and sharing then I do. I find myself learning from them.

Which leads me to the educational aspect of blocking certain sites. Dooes this teach our students anything other than to hide their knowledge from  us.  I m in agreement that we need to teah students to use the web safely so that predators hae a difficult time reaching them, but as teachers we need to learn safety and the many uses of the web as a teaching tool, too.

I have finally enrolled into a technology into education course of study. My district is not going to teach me these things, so I need to be proactive and learn on my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This letter template is not only well wriiten but educational as well.  I  am a veteran 4th grade teacher and I have and eleven year old daughter. I must admit that my fear of the &#8220;web&#8221; and communication via the internet has left me in the dark. My students and my daughter know more about the computer peering and sharing then I do. I find myself learning from them.</p>
<p>Which leads me to the educational aspect of blocking certain sites. Dooes this teach our students anything other than to hide their knowledge from  us.  I m in agreement that we need to teah students to use the web safely so that predators hae a difficult time reaching them, but as teachers we need to learn safety and the many uses of the web as a teaching tool, too.</p>
<p>I have finally enrolled into a technology into education course of study. My district is not going to teach me these things, so I need to be proactive and learn on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>Nancy,
Thanks for your contribution. I hope those senators are listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy,<br />
Thanks for your contribution. I hope those senators are listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 21:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>I am a school district library media coordinator in Colorado. Here is what I sent to our senators - with a subject line of "vote no on DOPA":

Please consider carefully the restrictions that DOPA will place on a school's ability to teach students how to be safe on the Internet. Completely removing access to social networking sites in schools will do little to deter students from accessing this information outside of school or even in schools as the knowledge of how to bypass filters seems to flow easily through the students. 

This new mode of communication and socialization is here to stay - and students have embraced it. Imagine a world in which playgrounds were chained up and students were forbidden to enter - due to the probability that a predator would find them there and hurt someone --or because students would not refrain from bullying each other. It is inconceivable that the public would accept this solution. Instead, we turn to character education and safety instruction such as "don't talk to strangers" to help our students understand the boundaries that exist for their own protection. We monitor this recreational space in schools, and when we observe inappropriate behavior, we can intervene and teach the students about the consequences of their behavior. We must do the same for the cybercommunity --a place where our students will spend a large amount of their time outside of school –unsupervised -  if the survey data is correct. 

If access is blocked at schools, than educators will not have the ability to teach students safe and ethical use within these social networking sites. Additionally, some excellent educational opportunities for global communication (21st century learning initiative) and sharing via blogs and other social networking sites will be shut down. We will not have the ability to teach students using "real world" situations because we will have to forbid them to enter the "real world" - their real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a school district library media coordinator in Colorado. Here is what I sent to our senators - with a subject line of &#8220;vote no on DOPA&#8221;:</p>
<p>Please consider carefully the restrictions that DOPA will place on a school&#8217;s ability to teach students how to be safe on the Internet. Completely removing access to social networking sites in schools will do little to deter students from accessing this information outside of school or even in schools as the knowledge of how to bypass filters seems to flow easily through the students. </p>
<p>This new mode of communication and socialization is here to stay - and students have embraced it. Imagine a world in which playgrounds were chained up and students were forbidden to enter - due to the probability that a predator would find them there and hurt someone &#8211;or because students would not refrain from bullying each other. It is inconceivable that the public would accept this solution. Instead, we turn to character education and safety instruction such as &#8220;don&#8217;t talk to strangers&#8221; to help our students understand the boundaries that exist for their own protection. We monitor this recreational space in schools, and when we observe inappropriate behavior, we can intervene and teach the students about the consequences of their behavior. We must do the same for the cybercommunity &#8211;a place where our students will spend a large amount of their time outside of school –unsupervised -  if the survey data is correct. </p>
<p>If access is blocked at schools, than educators will not have the ability to teach students safe and ethical use within these social networking sites. Additionally, some excellent educational opportunities for global communication (21st century learning initiative) and sharing via blogs and other social networking sites will be shut down. We will not have the ability to teach students using &#8220;real world&#8221; situations because we will have to forbid them to enter the &#8220;real world&#8221; - their real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6800</guid>
		<description>I especially like the section on encouraging schools to develop curriculum on this issue.

If you're looking for more solid points to include, see
&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/01/scitech/pcanswer/main1853357.shtml" rel="nofollow"&gt;Larry Magid's column&lt;/a&gt; today on the CBS News site.  It's an excellent critique of the law from someone who understands Internet safety issues inside out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I especially like the section on encouraging schools to develop curriculum on this issue.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking for more solid points to include, see<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/01/scitech/pcanswer/main1853357.shtml" rel="nofollow">Larry Magid&#8217;s column</a> today on the CBS News site.  It&#8217;s an excellent critique of the law from someone who understands Internet safety issues inside out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderland.northernattitude.org/2006/07/30/dear-senator/#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>John, thank you for your alertness to my spelling errors. Of all the times to neglect the spell checker...you might not know that I'm a spelling neurotic. It doesn't matter except that people are using it as an example. I hope they had more sense than I and checked themselves. it's fixed now. No telling how many senators will receive similar letters from folks who seem not to know that &lt;em&gt;nonetheless&lt;/em&gt; has &lt;em&gt;none&lt;/em&gt; in it, &lt;em&gt;supervision&lt;/em&gt; has an &lt;em&gt;r&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;amend&lt;/em&gt; has only 1 &lt;em&gt;m&lt;/em&gt;.  I don't know if the dash between &lt;em&gt;well&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;intentioned&lt;/em&gt; is wrong, or that &lt;em&gt;internet&lt;/em&gt; needs to be capitalized, but since you took the initiative to set me right, I'm going along with your spelling book.

I bookmarked the link to your class blogs in my &lt;a href="http://del.icio.us/noon/classroom_blogs"&gt;classroom blogs&lt;/a&gt; files. Nice work with your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, thank you for your alertness to my spelling errors. Of all the times to neglect the spell checker&#8230;you might not know that I&#8217;m a spelling neurotic. It doesn&#8217;t matter except that people are using it as an example. I hope they had more sense than I and checked themselves. it&#8217;s fixed now. No telling how many senators will receive similar letters from folks who seem not to know that <em>nonetheless</em> has <em>none</em> in it, <em>supervision</em> has an <em>r</em>, and <em>amend</em> has only 1 <em>m</em>.  I don&#8217;t know if the dash between <em>well</em> and <em>intentioned</em> is wrong, or that <em>internet</em> needs to be capitalized, but since you took the initiative to set me right, I&#8217;m going along with your spelling book.</p>
<p>I bookmarked the link to your class blogs in my <a href="http://del.icio.us/noon/classroom_blogs">classroom blogs</a> files. Nice work with your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
