This is an insight into my personality that was sparked by some recent noise that’s come up. It’s about a character flaw of mine that gets an occasional workout.
People say that blogging puts them in touch with others and connects them to information about God knows what, all over the planet…. Well, OK. But for me, keeping a weblog also shows me sides of myself that I’m not particularly proud of. Lately I’m inclined to agree with Donald Brook’s statement that Weblogs are Fucking Stupid. Read it, esp. Chapter 2.
About 20 years ago, when I was getting divorced, I decided that the thing to do was to go to grad school and get a counseling degree. That’s laughable to anyone who knows me. Nobody laughed then, in front of me anyway. I heard things like…”Mmmm, that’s interesting.” Or, “What will you do with that?” They were the sorts of things people say to someone with a bad haircut.
But I was pissed off and grumpy at the world, and I didn’t care. I didn’t want to be a counselor. But I knew I didn’t want to be an administrator, either, and Guidance and Counseling was the only other graduate program offered at the university.
On one notable evening early in the semester, at my Group Counseling course, we were given an exercise to work on called Spare Change. The professor told everyone to empty their purses and pockets of any change they had. He explained that some of us would be the custodians of this money, and that we would be charged with the task of deciding how it should be redistributed. We could even keep it if we wanted to. He didn’t tell us why we were doing this.
Some folks were unhappy right away. They needed the money for bus fare, they said. There were various issues that came up. He ignored them, and told them that it would be OK. As luck would have it, I got put into the group that got to have the money. We were sent into another room.
While we were in the other room, the professor told us to come up with a scheme for distributing the money, and then he went back to the rest of the class. None of us knew each other yet, because the class had only met one other time. We had 15 minutes to work out a solution to the problem.
Nobody said anything. Being the task-oriented type, I decided to spark some kind of process. “Well, what should we do?” I asked. Still, everyone sat waiting, not saying anything. We at least needed to get talking. I pressed on, and nudged and prodded to get the discussion going.
Eventually, we worked out a distribution plan that was based on a hierarchy of need. We were mindful of the fact that several of the people wanted their money back, and we wanted to be fair. We tried to think of all the angles.
It was my continuing bad luck that everyone backed away from being our spokesperson. So, by default, the job fell to me. We walked back into the classroom and the desks, those little single seats with the writing surface that comes up from the right arm, were arranged in a circle. The rest of the class was seated there, chatting quietly.
I put the money on my little desk top and began to explain what we’d decided. Right away, one of the guys – someone in an Admin program who was taking the course for an elective requirement, I think – started challenging our decision-making. He wasn’t nice. I tried to patiently explain how we’d tried to be equitable in our process, and how it would work.
I can’t remember the substance of the discussion, it’s been so long. What I do recall is that nothing I said was satisfactory to this guy. He started badgering me. His comments became personal. Looking back, I think it’s likely that I was set up, and that he was a ringer, playing the critic role.
It didn’t take long before I got completely pissed. Reason failed me. I picked the handful of money off the desktop – a couple of bucks – and threw it on the floor at the guy’s feet. To make a complete ass of myself, I said “F@%* you! Do it yourself.” And I walked out of the classroom, and went home.
It was only an exercise. Just a game. No big deal. Right?
Needless to say, it was awkward going to class the next week. A few people smiled when they saw me, and said things like “How’s it goin’, man?.” That sort of thing.
Strange, but I don’t recall us talking about this blow-up in class. We must have, but I don’t recall the discussion. I dropped out of the program the next semester, realizing that it wasn’t my calling. Not in this lifetime.
You might imagine that a person with a story like this has other examples that he could share, and I do. It amazes me how easily pissed off I can get when my good intentions are challenged. It isn’t breaking news that I can be an asshole. My reaction to anyone who says so is, “Yeah? And your point is?”
My abrasive charm in meatspace might not translate very well into cyberspace, and I want to remember that. Now I’m writing on this web site, and I see I haven’t learned very much about dealing with harassment. I’m not equipped to argue in public with strangers. I’ve learned that online belligerence is not a new problem for people. You might recognize some of these caricatures.
I’ve been thinking about how it is with teachers, when a parent comes in and questions us in a confrontational way. How does it feel? Have you ever been criticized for something you said, or didn’t say, or had your decision-making misrepresented?
One of my colleagues from way back told me that she tells parents that she’s willing to believe only half of what she hears about them if they’ll do the same for her.
Teachers are easy targets. Especially elementary teachers, I think. We spend all day and half the evening caring, on overtime, and when someone who has a gripe wants to unload on us, we bend over and say thanks for your input.
I can’t spend the rest of my life defending everything I say or do. I’m not going to try. If that’s intellectually dishonest, then anyone who disagrees with me is free to ignore me. I’ll do my best to return the favor. That’s what I’m learning now.
To clarify this new learning, I’m considering Donald Brook’s Disclaimer:
I realize that nothing I say matters to anyone else on the entire planet. My opinions are useless and unfocused. I am an expert in nothing. I know nothing. I am confused about almost everything. I cannot, as an individual, ever possibly know everything, or even enough to make editorial commentary on the vast majority of things that exist in my world. This is a stupid document; it is meaningless drivel that I do not expect any of the several billion people on my planet to actually read…..
updated: removed the last part. I’m chillin. Back soon.


4 Comments
Awww, man, that was uncalled for. So are your readers also idiots for coming to read what you write? I’m still gonna be visiting, coz you’ll get over this, and your quiet, solid inquiry interests and stimulates me. I’m an adult and can make up my own mind about whether you’re right or wrong, or whether what you write is worth reading or not. I’ve got a few other things to say about this dustup, which I’ll post over on my blog in the next few days. Take a break if you have to, but come back.
I read Chapter two.
Having recently decided to write a blog…I thought about it. Am thinking. It’s very cutting….. But it’s possibly the motivators, true, being reflective just doing something…its hard..to know anything. I know so little really.
Writing to anyone at all reading it, after 23 years of silent teaching, especially to try and share out of frustration, and of course totally and completely looking for places where other teachers might be considering same kinds of things, seems to fit inside that anaylsis…yes.. Chapter two. Read it again, toning down the pain of awareness…will need to do.
The secret sharing, voyeur things and the rest will take some processing awhile from my world of denial just like really looking daily at what I do in teaching takes awhile and loads of self-doubt to process…but it is true …..that much I see about considering intents. I wanted to voice concerns from my classroom, share, read from a place where someone had interesting things to say, do this while recovering from chemo treatments so without getting out , having less a life…and ….sorry…I learned good things in the process. Altho its a bit fast paced. See for me I loved having a beautiful piece on constructivist learning, loved reading of a teacher with a wife teacher saying a bit about the realities of NCLB, found it fascinating someone in Japan worked with students creating authentic writing with the same concerns I had twenty years ago in South Central and mostly met a fascinating person who is very honest with himself and others, all the time. And who gets upset. I liked that, like it too. And then there is that otherness…the ugly in the world teachers kind of have to take…yes, you frame it well here. This actually let me look at that too. I understand better the nature of what I’m doing just through that, isn’t that interesting? Well to me it has good or even great value. I’m sorry however for anything hurting.
Somehow for me this kind of talks about who we are.
I’m not a real big examiner of why I make art, drop themes, read romance novels for a year then abandon them, I don’t figure out why I read those ridiculously stupid books I find in my book box from time to time or wonder how this person got to be my friend….I’m not inclined to that self reflective piece enough as I’m usually in the choas of this piece of timing and day, but I absolutely know I must be doing whatever I’m doing trying to meet a need or fufill a personal issue.And I talk about it self-righteously to hide insecurities and personal failures and ….yet I know…loads of time…. experiences led me to conclude…I don’t know anything at all. Most of what I do leads me there of late. Big void. Sure. (Altho not with a bong or Birkenstocks as both rather aren’t my thing.) I’m just going along being a teacher …..writing now to that as I saw so few peers in my world reflecting on it all.
Anyway, I’ll try and reflect on this piece, reread all the pieces in the puzzle, figure out what in the world this said today, stay away from hauling my issues here….but I have got a thought about getting “your own life” or the find your own path, or the frisbee thing…..I used to hear this when artists got together too. Lots of debate in the 70′s of my life about why make or share anything…about the inherent voyeur aspects(I mean you make it only for someone else to look at and reject or love and your soul you think is poured there-cause it’s like Sharing Time in Kinder ..maybe we are really there to be affirmed), the ego strands , the ultimate self-disgust with how far product fell from intention..the ease with which deconstruction occurred. And Oh I was such a failure at taking what others said of my work it all, ALL, or most made is under a bed, in boxes, volumes of poems sit in data bases, stories written by the hundreds poured away until this little trigger in NCLB and with a thought about maybe my longevity was an issue… caused me to surface it….so know a few words turned-it’s hurtful and often completely true in some ways, that I have insights about…..My art teacher Sharon said always to me she continued to do her work everyday for her greatest fear was if she stopped and analysed too long she’d never work again. Recently I talked to her about that again after 30 years as I stated I wanted to finally share some things Imade out in the world…and she went on to say that for her the reasons why we are creative, why we produce might be traced to needs or wants, hurts, lacks, failures of love-unfacable stuff mostly, maybe are about needing a dog or getting a life…….. but lots of people from those places turn to self destruction, to disintegrating kinds of process, to hurting others, criticism, to placing projections…which she’d be the first to say is her battle too…but in the main she created just because she had to do it. It was aligned with her life force. (real daisy chain talk)I kind of like that for writing, teaching, making artworks….it was just where I was at….so obviously carrying this enormous amount of “I had to do it.”
Great stories, Doug.
Your doing alright in my book,
nsl
YOU’RE! You’re doing alright in my book. … I want you to know that I looked up ‘alright’ to make sure I was using it correctly. As I was reading your next post, I saw my typo.
This is a friendly place. Jackasses will come by and stink up the place. They don’t get it. You aren’t writing for them and we aren’t reading to see if you are loved by everyone.
The idea of the appropriate response fits here. Apology or explanation not required. Good stories are always appreciated.
Post a Comment