Winners and Losers
Yesterday was report card day, and I passed them out at 3:00. I almost handed them out earlier, with the envelopes opened, because I didn’t want to lick them all. But then I knew they’d start to compare, and there’d be all sorts of celebrating and hurt feelings and questons. So I taped the envelopes shut and kept them until the end of the day.
I got a call during the morning before school started when I was scrambling trying to get the report cards stuffed into envelopes - so that the name on the envelope matched the name on the card, because it’s embarrassing when they don’t - and my first thought was, “How could someone be calling to ask about the grades when I haven’t even sent the cards home yet?” But, of course, that was just a reflex response to the job.
The call was from a parent who wanted to tell me why her daughter didn’t turn in homework on Friday. As if some other children didn’t turn in homework? I didn’t say that. I listened politely, and heard the story about how they worked on it very hard and it somehow got lost.
She suggested that if I would send it home again, they could do it over, and would that be OK?
I told her that I understood, and that really the value was in the doing of it, and that I didn’t really need it for anything. And in the future she could send me a note and everything would be all right.
Then she said that she’d send me the note tomorrow.
I told her that the phone call was more than enough, and that I didn’t need the note now. I also told her that I hoped there wasn’t any nervousness about not doing the homework, because I’m not used to playing the villain.
This mom didn’t know that during the day, Sunday, when I’d written the report cards, I was also reading a book that I picked up at the library. It’s an oldie, with elements of the “Beat novel,” according to the Amazon publisher’s description, called “How to Survive in Your Native Land” by James Herndon. Irreverent, funny, cynical, down on schooling, I remembered the chapter called Explanatory Note #1: Find a Good School and Send your Kid There.
Herndon tells a story about how his kid burst into tears on the way to school because he forgot his homework, and he wonders why his child is frightened of the school. He said,
…There is one reason, and only one, and it is crucial. That is that an American public school must have winners and losers. It does not matter in this respect what kind of school it is. In Berkeley, now that Mr. Sullivan has integrated the schools, it is the black kids who sit in Remedial Reading and the white kids who sit in Enriched this or that. When they are together in some general course the well-dressed sharp clean-and-pressed shoe-shined poor black kid sits in the class next to the Salvation-army-surplus-store-ugly-dressed white rich kid and the beautiful pore black kid doesn’t know what the teacher is talking about and the white ugly rich kid knows everything and can read or even has read everything the teacher can, even if that surplus-store white kid disdains the whole thing and won’t answer or discuss or even attend class…try as he may to become an outcast the school knows that he is a winner even if he rejects winning….But over in Oakland there will be an all-black school, Mr. Sullivan not having passed through that town yet. It may be that the school would prefer to have some ugly white kids to be winners but they in fact ain’t got any. Does that mean a school full of losers? Not at all. That school has got to have winners too, and so some sharp poor beautiful black kids wind up in the A group and some others in the H group. It may be that if the kids in the Oakland A winner’s group transferred over to Berkeley they would end up being losing kids, or it may be not. It doesn’t make any difference. In Oakland they are winners. The H kids find the A kids in line at the cafeteria and hit them in they mouths….
That is why Jack, my beloved son of seven years, bursts into tears and cannot be consoled. that is why some students of M.I.T. are throwing dodge balls at each other’s heads, and a large group of physicists stands around the outskirts of the school grounds crying, and why nothing can console them even if someone hits them or doesn’t hit them in they mouths.
They cry because the losers are going to get some revenge some way. but they also cry because the winning is never permanent. You may be a winner in the first grade, but but the fourth you may be losing. The rights of passage of the school go on and on. Each year it is circumcision time all over again; obviously you may weep for what has been hacked off by the time you are thirty five and have a PhD.
How does the school make certain that it will have winners and losers? Well, obviously by giving grades. If you give A’s, you must also give F’s…
I see this unholy truth, and I can see why some people believe there might be the wrong number of A’s or F’s from leaving it up to the teacher to decide who gets what. So to make it seem fair, we have Standards that apply across the board.
And we have tests with teeth that make it possible for the black kids to not have to show up over at the white kids’ school to find out that they are losers. Now they can stay right in their own neighborhoods to find that out, because standardized tests can measure anybody against anything anywhere, and tell them they go to a loser school without doing anything to change that except give them more tests and regimentation. The simplicity of standardized tests, or any other thing that is standardized for that matter, is their beauty. Boil it down to a couple of numbers and write the ticket.
Nothing like a day of doing grade reports to bring it out in me.
I opened the paper Sunday morning and found an article about the North Slope Borough School District’s Inupiat Education Initiative. There’s some Eskimo people living on the Chuchki Sea who’ve been smart enough to figure out how to make a living off whales and walrus, caribou and the geese for a very long time. But now in the last century they began losing touch with the old ways. Kids got shipped off to boarding schools for many years… Whole villages with no children. They have schools in the villages now, but some serious damage has been done, and the white man curriculum doesn’t make a lot of sense where they live.
They want their kids back, and to teach their own culture in their schools.
“In the Native way there was no failure,” said Ramona Rock. “If you were sewing and you did it wrong, you didn’t fail, you just had to do it over. Maybe you didn’t want to, but you did anyway.”
I wonder if it is possible for there to be no losers in school. If - they were measured against real world conditions, and they could do things over when they needed to, and if they risked being cold or hungry when things didn’t work out. But I don’t see that on the near horizon. As long as we say yes to this and perhaps to that, there will be winners and losers.

Sarah Puglisi wrote,
There is a story I read in high school called, “The Real Thing” written by Henry James. It was fairly complex for me then, a story of an artist that paints from models to produce portraits of the monied elite for sale. It must by definition appeal to those with the money and by definition show them as superior beings.After all the class system in England demanded adherance to that notion…class tells..An inenviable truth of art is that it often serves this master. As it happens the painter cannot work well (paints flat unsuccessful work)with models from the wealthy elite-even if painting them, he has to work with two models that are very poor. It seems they can “affect” poses and mannerisms enabling the painter the ability to capture the wealthy patron…a kind of process whereby he has to have the poor to be able to “see” the rich.
And here of course is Herndon talking. He hit it so clearly.
What has happened I think in Standardized testing in this country is that this enormous group with affluence that scores well has assumed this test measured their inherent goodness, value, intelligences…they have presumed that in this process something is being “known” which serves to assuage man’s basic insecurities and value issues that drive so much of this age of insecurity. So much more can be said about this but as I teach over there on the other side of the track….looking at abilities, talents, knowing as Mark Twain wrote so beautifully in the “Prince and the Pauper” that survival in the world of poverty takes so much that this high scoring group would find difficult to deal with- despite all that test data to verify their “status”-i know the “real thing” and I think actually we all know the real truth too which is why the extremes and emotions and all the anger of the now. I think we know…. Anyway reflecting through the lens of that book, The Real Thing, I see all too often that the failure of one group supports the success of the other…as you have so well articulated and Herdon was compelled to expose.
Having now worked a lifetime in this world of poverty and desire to bear witness about what I learned …i see now that , if I can borrow some psychological tools, one group is a projection or mirror for the other. My little class of poor immigrants scoring poorly on rigged materials stands holding up the mirror for the group that doesn’t like to face some basic truths. It’s hard to feel too good and hold Christian virtues while living high and having more without a kind of system created to give yourself an illusion…”I earned this”,I deserve my fortune, I did it myself, I was better and deserve it, mine have “gifts”, we are somehow “more”.
It’s a whole lot harder to see everone else as not only your equal but quite possibly one you may never equal. ( or as i am often made to recall…the meek…do unto others)
To me writing grade cards reflects this real thing…this kind of symbol of what we can’t yet face as an educational system and fix or at least address, what we can’t get beyond, what we don’t examine and what we impose on children as we project onto them an abysmal amount of unresolved educational societal projection.
And leaving my poor kinds of language connections…the greatest truth I know about kids is tracking them and staying connected through time with them-the one thing the system absolutely will not and does not do …..and that is as far away from how a loving group would ever behave as you can get…….we never reflect in a system like way on the thoughts and perceptions of those we have guided.We don’t follow kids into their lives which would be a report of great help on what we are doing…a much fuller report. And we don’t let the kids “grade” our work as teachers in return… This is no way to run a school…Grades at present are about as useful as all the other myths maintained…..just social sorters.
I have a friend that sits at conferences with a blank card, says what he wants about the child and the work they are doing, asks the parent what grades they feel that fit the child and they fill it in together. It’s no solution but it’s something that makes his peer teachers livid. It’s as if this alone somehow makes a mockery of their work. Listening over the years to perceptions of this from children, parents, teachers, former families has given me incredible insights into what grades actually do….often times they just injure .
And I’m not interested in “doing harm”…what I’m interested in is reading, painting, connecting, drawing, singing, celebrating, outlining, sorting, listing, assessing, designing, sharing, helping, algebratizing, counting, processing, debating, and all the things no card ever really helps me talk about……thanks Doug for a very nice reflection.
Link | October 31st, 2006 at 6:24 pm
Will Richardson wrote,
Doug,
I just want to say how much I am moved by your blogging. Your writing style just blows me away, and I greatly appreciate your willingness to share your struggles (as well as your successes) with us. Makes me think hard about my own kids and what they are learning from this system.
Best,
Will
Link | November 1st, 2006 at 12:09 pm
Stephen Lazar wrote,
Herndon’s book is my favorite on Education. It’s great to see another fan. A great post! (as always).
Link | November 2nd, 2006 at 11:05 am
Borderland » Blog Archive » Report Card Reform wrote,
[...] isn’t real education reform. It doesn’t address any core problems. There will still be winners and losers. The curriculum remains securely in place. And this is, after all, only about grades and report [...]
Link | January 11th, 2008 at 7:48 am