We have all been here before…
I found this old book in the university library, The Transformation of the School, by Lawrence A. Cremin. It’s a historical account of the progressive movement in American education (1867-1957). The book was written in 1961. The cover is loose, and it hasn’t been checked out since 1995, but it seems as good a place as any for me to begin reading up on the history of education reform. I’ve been thinking that a historical perspective might help me better understand the modern-day politics of schooling.
Coincidentally, Chris Lehman is also thinking about this. He has a reading list, as well. I completely agree with him when he says:
Let’s put our ideas in context. Let’s look backward as we look ahead. Let’s take the time to step back and, in the words of Robert Pirsig, ask ourselves not, “What’s new?” but instead ask ourselves, “What’s good?”
I’m only about a third of the way through my book, but my strongest impression so far is that education reform must surely be a mobius strip topic, since so many discussions about schools seem not to be oriented toward any concrete reference point. Note: “The future” is not a concrete reference point.
We can trace the relationship between education and social engineering back to Horace Mann’s idea of the Common School as an instrument for creating social good. And from there we inherit the struggle over Chris’ (and Pirsig’s) big question, “What is good?” Everyone has a stake in this discussion, which is why it’s important to know what it’s all about, and why.
I’m going to be off-blog/offline for a few days. Got some reading to do…

Artichoke wrote,
I think finding out “what’s good” is related to Humberto Maturana’s thinking about change - what is most important is what is conserved (aka what’s good”)
“What is conserved defines identity. But what is conserved also defines what can change. This is interesting. We are so concerned about change, yet what is most important is what is conserved… politics conserve. Even revolutionaries conserve. All systems only exist as long as there is conservation of that which defines them.
Link | July 4th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
Doug Noon wrote,
I like Maturana’s ecological view of systems, and we might be able to make use of that understanding as we think about how we’d like schools to be. But I’m not sure he can help us with the “What is good?” question.
As I understand it, he sees change as an adaptive process in which the essential properties of an organism are retained so that it continues to be whatever it was. This reminds me of what happens when I clean out the basement, and have to think about what to keep and what to pitch. Don’t I still have to ask myself “What is good?” in order to get the job done?
I’ll have to read some more in order to understand how Maturana makes sense of politics.
Link | July 5th, 2007 at 8:49 am
Borderland » Blog Archive » Salvaging What’s Good wrote,
[...] found Neil Postman’s Teaching as A Conserving Activity after reading Artichoke’s comment , quoting Humberto Maturana: “What is conserved defines identity. But what is conserved also [...]
Link | July 21st, 2007 at 5:55 pm